<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Amendment 49</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ethicalstandardsnow.org/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ethicalstandardsnow.org</link>
	<description>Colorado Amendment 49 keeps lobbyists in line</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 15:12:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Illegal Anti-49 Electioneering Yields New Complaint</title>
		<link>http://www.ethicalstandardsnow.org/2008/10/illegal-anti-49-electioneering-yields-new-complaint/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ethicalstandardsnow.org/2008/10/illegal-anti-49-electioneering-yields-new-complaint/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 15:12:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Yes on Amendment 49</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Press Releases]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[accountant]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Amendment 47]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Amendment 49]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Amendment 54]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[banker]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Boulder Daily Camera]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[collection agent]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Coloradans for Middle Class Relief]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Colorado Secretary of State]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Colorado Springs Gazette]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Complaint]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[deception]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Denver Post]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[electioneering]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[endorsements]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Ethical Standards]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[flyers]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[good-government]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[government collection services]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Grand Junction Sentinel]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[issue committee]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Jon Caldara]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[lobby]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Longmont Times-Call]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Loveland Reporter-Herald]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[political organizations]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Protect Colorado's Future]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[public services]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Pueblo Chieftain]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Reginald Perry]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Rocky Mountain News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[special interests]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[tax dollars]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[unethical]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ethicalstandardsnow.org/?p=333</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Illegal Anti-49 Electioneering Yields New Complaint
Well-Heeled Issue Committee’s Attacks Overstep Legal Bounds
ENGLEWOOD, CO – A leading proponent of a good-government initiative on this November’s ballot has filed a complaint against a group registered to oppose a different amendment.
Jon Caldara today submitted a formal complaint with the Colorado Secretary of State against the issue committee Coloradans [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p align="center"><strong>Illegal Anti-49 Electioneering Yields New Complaint<br />
Well-Heeled Issue Committee’s Attacks Overstep Legal Bounds</strong></p>
<p>ENGLEWOOD, CO – A leading proponent of a good-government initiative on this November’s ballot has filed a complaint against a group registered to oppose a different amendment.</p>
<p>Jon Caldara today submitted a formal complaint with the Colorado Secretary of State against the issue committee Coloradans for Middle Class Relief (CMCR). CMCR is officially registered only “to oppose statewide Amendment 47,” yet has mailed out flyers (links to images below) that also specifically oppose Amendment 49 (Ethical Standards) and Amendment 54. </p>
<p>A pair of formal complaints now have been submitted in the past week regarding anti-Amendment 49 activities that violate election law. On October 22, Colorado Springs resident and former school board candidate Reginald Perry filed a formal complaint against Protect Colorado&#8217;s Future (PCF) and another issue committee for an illicit transfer of resources. </p>
<p>Numerous media outlets further have called out PCF for its blatantly deceptive advertising.</p>
<p>“What we have now are well-heeled union lobbyists not only deceiving the public, but also breaking the law to do it,” Caldara said.</p>
<p>PCF and CMCR have combined to spend more than $20 million in the 2008 election.</p>
<p>“Some special interests clearly think they are blessed with the dual privilege of receiving government collection services and campaigning above the law,” said Caldara. “That only helps to make the case for Ethical Standards.”</p>
<p>Amendment 49 will prohibit governments from bundling money from public employees’ paychecks and delivering the funds to special interest groups.  These special interests use the money to lobby the same politicians who just delivered the cash to them. </p>
<p>“It’s unethical for government to be the banker, accountant, and collection agent for political special interests,” Caldara said. “Government should be using our tax dollars and our civil servants’ time to provide crucial public services, not to funnel money to political organizations.”</p>
<p>Major newspapers supporting Amendment 49 include the <em>Wall Street Journal</em>, <em>Denver Post</em>, <em>Rocky Mountain News</em>, <em>Boulder Daily Camera</em>, <em>Pueblo Chieftain</em>, <em>Grand Junction Daily Sentinel</em>, <em>Colorado Springs Gazette</em>, <em>Longmont Times-Call</em>, and <em>Loveland Reporter-Herald</em>.</p>
<p><strong>Links to evidence of campaign finance violation</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.i2i.org/images/CPMC3R.jpg">Flyer 1</a><br />
Flyer 2: <a href="http://www.i2i.org/images/CPMC1.jpg">Side A</a> &#038; <a href="http://www.i2i.org/images/CPMC2.jpg">Side B</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ethicalstandardsnow.org/2008/10/illegal-anti-49-electioneering-yields-new-complaint/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Colorado Sheriffs Debunk Distortions Against Amendment 49</title>
		<link>http://www.ethicalstandardsnow.org/2008/10/colorado-sheriffs-debunk-distortions-against-amendment-49/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ethicalstandardsnow.org/2008/10/colorado-sheriffs-debunk-distortions-against-amendment-49/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 16:26:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Yes on Amendment 49</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Amendment 49]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[debunk]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[deception]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Ethical Standards]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[press release]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[sheriffs]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ethicalstandardsnow.org/?p=330</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Read the press release here.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><center><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/fK6A-QJLJEI&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/fK6A-QJLJEI&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></center></p>
<p><a href="http://www.ethicalstandardsnow.org/2008/10/sheriffs-shoot-down-lies-against-amendment-49/">Read the press release here.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ethicalstandardsnow.org/2008/10/colorado-sheriffs-debunk-distortions-against-amendment-49/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rocky Mountain News Dismantles Outrageous Lies Against Amendment 49</title>
		<link>http://www.ethicalstandardsnow.org/2008/10/rocky-mountain-news-dismantles-outrageous-lies-against-amendment-49/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ethicalstandardsnow.org/2008/10/rocky-mountain-news-dismantles-outrageous-lies-against-amendment-49/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 16:22:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Yes on Amendment 49</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[In the Media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Amendment 49]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[business organizations]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[campaign]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[clean shot]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[corporations]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[deception]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[defense contractors]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[drug companies]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[dues collection]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[endorsements]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Ethical Standards]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[facts]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[firefighters]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[initiative]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[level playing field]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[lobbying]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[moral of the story]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[multinational corporations]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[new burden]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[newspapers]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[nurses]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[police officers]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Protect Colorado's Future]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[public policy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[public safety]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[refuting]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Rocky Mountain News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[small business]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[teachers]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[unfair advantage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ethicalstandardsnow.org/?p=326</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Rocky Mountain News - one of many major Colorado newspapers to endorse Amendment 49, the Ethical Standards initiative - put out a hard-hitting editorial today knocking down the grossly deceptive arguments against the good-government measure. The deceptive arguments are bankrolled by millions of dollars from lobbying groups. 
A couple key excerpts:

The foes of 49 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <em>Rocky Mountain News</em> - one of many major Colorado newspapers <a href="http://www.ethicalstandardsnow.org/amendment-49-endorsements/">to endorse Amendment 49</a>, the Ethical Standards initiative - put out <a href="http://www.rockymountainnews.com/news/2008/oct/30/the-anti-49-smears/">a hard-hitting editorial</a> today knocking down the grossly deceptive arguments against the good-government measure. The deceptive arguments are bankrolled by millions of dollars from lobbying groups. </p>
<p>A couple key excerpts:<br />
<blockquote>
<p>The foes of 49 haven&#8217;t taken a clean shot at it yet. They&#8217;ve run no ads attacking the measure on its own. Instead, they&#8217;ve lumped the three ballot issues together. Since each is different, the campaign against 49 has been especially misleading.</p>
<p>Ads opposing 49 claim it would muzzle government workers and endanger public safety. One ad from the labor-backed group Protect Colorado&#8217;s Future says 49 (and the other measures) would &#8220;silence the voices of firefighters, police officers, teachers and nurses&#8221; and &#8220;end up making what [they] do harder.&#8221;</p>
<p>In what way? The amendment doesn&#8217;t say unions can&#8217;t collect dues. It just says government can&#8217;t collect dues for them.</p></blockquote>
<p></p>
<p>And:<br />
<blockquote>
<p>A third ad makes the bizarre claim that the three measures would &#8220;silence small business,&#8221; when 49 has nothing to do with small business. The same ad states, correctly, that Amendment 49 would not apply to &#8220;multinational corporations,&#8221; including drug companies and defense contractors. Of course it wouldn&#8217;t, since the amendment would end free union dues collection by governments.</p>
<p>The implication of that ad is that 49 would give businesses an unfair advantage in lobbying the government; public-employee unions would face a new burden that would not apply to corporations. In fact, ending the practice of free dues collection would simply level the playing field among unions, business organizations and any other group that tries to influence public policy.</p></blockquote>
<p></p>
<p>The moral of the story? Get the facts for yourself. Don&#8217;t be fooled by the multi-million dollar ad campaign paid for by (mostly union) lobbyists against ethical standards in government.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ethicalstandardsnow.org/2008/10/rocky-mountain-news-dismantles-outrageous-lies-against-amendment-49/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sheriffs Shoot Down Lies Against Amendment 49</title>
		<link>http://www.ethicalstandardsnow.org/2008/10/sheriffs-shoot-down-lies-against-amendment-49/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ethicalstandardsnow.org/2008/10/sheriffs-shoot-down-lies-against-amendment-49/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 13:35:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Yes on Amendment 49</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Press Releases]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Amendment 49]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Arapahoe County]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[audio clips]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[body armor]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Boulder County]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Boulder Daily Camera]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[campaign]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Colorado Springs Gazette]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[David Weaver]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Denver Post]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Douglas County]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[El Paso County]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Ethical Standards]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[flyers]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Front Range counties]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Grand Junction Sentinel]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Grayson Robinson]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Jefferson County]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Joe Pelle]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[John Cooke]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Longmont Times-Call]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Loveland Reporter-Herald]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Protect Colorado's Future]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Pueblo Chieftain]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Rocky Mountain News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[safety equipment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[sheriffs]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Ted Mink]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[television ads]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Terry Maketa]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Weld County]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ethicalstandardsnow.org/?p=323</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sheriffs Shoot Down Lies Against Amendment 49
“Deception” called “insulting”; Officers still get their body armor
DENVER – Six elected sheriffs from major Front Range counties today publicly refuted the deception in the campaign against Amendment 49. 
Five of the six counties represented by the sheriffs have enacted an Ethical Standards policy very similar to what Amendment [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p align="center"><strong>Sheriffs Shoot Down Lies Against Amendment 49<br />
“Deception” called “insulting”; Officers still get their body armor</strong></p>
<p>DENVER – Six elected sheriffs from major Front Range counties today publicly refuted the deception in the campaign against Amendment 49. </p>
<p>Five of the six counties represented by the sheriffs have enacted an Ethical Standards policy very similar to what Amendment 49 proposes. The issue committee Protect Colorado’s Future has run a multi-million dollar campaign with flyers and television ads falsely claiming that 49 will deprive law enforcement of needed safety equipment.</p>
<p>“There&#8217;s a lot of deception going on stating that police officers, deputy sheriffs are not going to receive their body armor, aren&#8217;t going to receive their vests,” said Douglas County Sheriff David Weaver. “That is totally inaccurate.” He noted that Douglas County, which passed Ethical Standards in October 2007, just today received notification of grant funding to obtain more body armor for the sheriff’s department.</p>
<p>Weld County, which adopted the policy in August 2007, has had a similar experience. “I think it&#8217;s ludicrous and insulting on some of these ads that say we can&#8217;t do as good a job if 49 passes,” said Sheriff John Cooke. </p>
<p>Cooke decried the ads saying that Amendment 49 would restrict how public safety employees can spend their money. “That is not true,” Cooke said. “Weld County stopped this practice. What the people did is they just set up a private account with a bank.”</p>
<p>Weaver and Cooke were joined by Jefferson County Sheriff Ted Mink, Arapahoe County Sheriff Grayson Robinson, Boulder County Sheriff Joe Pelle, and El Paso County Sheriff Terry Maketa in writing an open letter to refute the deceptive campaign against Amendment 49. The six sheriffs include five Republicans and one Democrat.</p>
<p>“Many of our counties already have a policy like 49 in place, and our departments remain equipped to keep themselves safe while ready and able to serve the people of our communities,” the letter states. </p>
<p>Also known as the Ethical Standards initiative, Amendment 49 will prohibit governments from bundling money from public employees’ paychecks and delivering the funds to special interest groups.  These special interests use the money to lobby the same politicians who just delivered the cash to them. Major Colorado newspapers supporting Amendment 49 include the <em>Denver Post</em>, <em>Rocky Mountain News</em>, <em>Boulder Daily Camera</em>, <em>Pueblo Chieftain</em>, <em>Grand Junction Daily Sentinel</em>, <em>Colorado Springs Gazette</em>, <em>Longmont Times-Call</em>, and <em>Loveland Reporter-Herald</em>. </p>
<p>The twelve Colorado counties that have adopted Ethical Standards are: El Paso, Arapahoe, Jefferson, Larimer, Douglas, Weld, Mesa, Montrose, Delta, Elbert, Teller, a Kit Carson.</p>
<p>Listen to audio from<br />
Sheriff John Cooke <a href="http://audio.ivoices.org/mp3/cooke1.mp3">1</a>, <a href="http://audio.ivoices.org/mp3/cooke2.mp3">2</a>, <a href="http://audio.ivoices.org/mp3/cooke3.mp3">3</a><br />
Sheriff David Weaver <a href="http://audio.ivoices.org/mp3/weaver1.mp3">1</a>, <a href="http://audio.ivoices.org/mp3/weaver2.mp3">2</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ethicalstandardsnow.org/2008/10/sheriffs-shoot-down-lies-against-amendment-49/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
<enclosure url="http://audio.ivoices.org/mp3/cooke1.mp3" length="212323" type="audio/mpeg" />
<enclosure url="http://audio.ivoices.org/mp3/cooke2.mp3" length="316813" type="audio/mpeg" />
<enclosure url="http://audio.ivoices.org/mp3/cooke3.mp3" length="299677" type="audio/mpeg" />
<enclosure url="http://audio.ivoices.org/mp3/weaver1.mp3" length="547527" type="audio/mpeg" />
<enclosure url="http://audio.ivoices.org/mp3/weaver2.mp3" length="252865" type="audio/mpeg" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Colorado Springs Gazette Reaffirms Support for Amendment 49</title>
		<link>http://www.ethicalstandardsnow.org/2008/10/colorado-springs-gazette-reaffirms-support-for-amendment-49/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ethicalstandardsnow.org/2008/10/colorado-springs-gazette-reaffirms-support-for-amendment-49/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 13:06:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Yes on Amendment 49</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[In the Media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Amendment 49]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Boulder Daily Camera]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Colorado Springs Gazette]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Denver Post]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[endorsement]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Ethical Standards]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Grand Junction Sentinel]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Jeffco Mile High Newspapers]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Longmont Times-Call]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Loveland Reporter-Herald]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[newspapers]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[payroll deduction]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Pueblo Chieftain]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Rocky Mountain News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Salida Mountain Mail]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[support]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ethicalstandardsnow.org/?p=320</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Colorado Springs Gazette yesterday reaffirmed its support for Amendment 49, the Ethical Standards initiative:
YES on Amendment 49 (stops government employers from collecting union dues with payroll deduction).

Other newspapers that have endorsed Amendment 49 include:

Wall Street Journal
Denver Post
Rocky Mountain News
Boulder Daily Camera
Pueblo Chieftain
Grand Junction Sentinel
Longmont Times-Call
Loveland Reporter-Herald
Salida Mountain Mail
Jefferson County Mile High Newspapers

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <em>Colorado Springs Gazette</em> yesterday <a href="http://www.gazette.com/opinion/amendment_42578___article.html/city_gazette.html">reaffirmed its support for Amendment 49</a>, the Ethical Standards initiative:<br />
<blockquote>YES on Amendment 49 (stops government employers from collecting union dues with payroll deduction).</p></blockquote>
<p></p>
<p>Other newspapers that have <a href="http://www.ethicalstandardsnow.org/amendment-49-endorsements/">endorsed Amendment 49</a> include:</p>
<ul>
<li>Wall Street Journal</li>
<li>Denver Post</li>
<li>Rocky Mountain News</li>
<li>Boulder Daily Camera</li>
<li>Pueblo Chieftain</li>
<li>Grand Junction Sentinel</li>
<li>Longmont Times-Call</li>
<li>Loveland Reporter-Herald</li>
<li>Salida Mountain Mail</li>
<li>Jefferson County Mile High Newspapers</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ethicalstandardsnow.org/2008/10/colorado-springs-gazette-reaffirms-support-for-amendment-49/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Northern Colorado Legislative Alliance Explains Support for Amendment 49</title>
		<link>http://www.ethicalstandardsnow.org/2008/10/northern-colorado-legislative-alliance-explains-support-for-amendment-49/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ethicalstandardsnow.org/2008/10/northern-colorado-legislative-alliance-explains-support-for-amendment-49/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 15:56:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Yes on Amendment 49</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[In the Media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Amendment 49]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Bill Owens]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Bill Ritter]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[bookkeeping services]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[bundling]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[business organizations]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[civic organizations]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[civil servants' time]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[collection services]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[counties]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Denver Metro Chamber of Commerce]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[endorsements]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Ethical Standards]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Executive Order]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Fort Collins Coloradoan]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[higher ethical standards]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[nonessential task]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Northern Colorado Legislative Alliance]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[public employees]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Sandra Hagen Solin]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[special interests]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[taxpayer dollars]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[unethical]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[unions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ethicalstandardsnow.org/?p=317</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sandra Hagen Solin, writing as the issues manager for the Northern Colorado Legislative Alliance (NCLA), explains in today&#8217;s Fort Collins Coloradoan why her organization backs Amendment 49, the Ethical Standards initiative:

Amendment 49 prevents state and local governments from bundling money from public employees&#8217; paychecks and delivering the funds to special interests, like unions. The NCLA [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sandra Hagen Solin, writing as the issues manager for the Northern Colorado Legislative Alliance (NCLA), explains in today&#8217;s <em>Fort Collins Coloradoan</em> <a href="http://www.coloradoan.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20081029/OPINION04/810290328">why her organization backs Amendment 49</a>, the Ethical Standards initiative:<br />
<blockquote>
<p>Amendment 49 prevents state and local governments from bundling money from public employees&#8217; paychecks and delivering the funds to special interests, like unions. The NCLA believes taxpayer dollars and civil servants&#8217; time should not be used providing collection and bookkeeping services for these groups.</p>
<p>Additionally, the NCLA believes it is unethical for governments to collect money from their employees&#8217; paychecks for special interests that spend their funds lobbying the same governments&#8217; elected officials.</p>
<p>Former Gov. Owens signed an executive order accomplishing exactly what Amendment 49 sets out to do early in his tenure. The order was overturned, however, when Gov. Ritter took office.</p>
<p>Twelve counties throughout the state, representing over half of the population of Colorado, already have similar rules on their books.</p>
<p>&#8230;Amendment 49 will hold Colorado governments to higher ethical standards and remove a nonessential task from governments that should have never been implemented in the first place.</p></blockquote>
<p></p>
<p>NCLA is one of numerous business and civic organizations across Colorado that have <a href="http://www.ethicalstandardsnow.org/amendment-49-endorsements/">publicly endorsed Amendment 49</a>. Just a few of them are:</p>
<ul>
<li>Denver Metro Chamber of Commerce</li>
<li>Colorado Health Care Association</li>
<li>Colorado Farm Bureau</li>
<li>Colorado Contractors Association</li>
<li>Colorado Home Builders Association</li>
<li>National Federation of Independent Business</li>
<li>Fort Collins Chamber of Commerce</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ethicalstandardsnow.org/2008/10/northern-colorado-legislative-alliance-explains-support-for-amendment-49/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Coloradoan Letter Writer: Amendment 49 about Basic Fairness and Ethics</title>
		<link>http://www.ethicalstandardsnow.org/2008/10/coloradoan-letter-writer-amendment-49-about-basic-fairness-and-ethics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ethicalstandardsnow.org/2008/10/coloradoan-letter-writer-amendment-49-about-basic-fairness-and-ethics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 13:42:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Yes on Amendment 49</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Amendment 49]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[ballot language]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[collection agency]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[constitutional proposal]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[editors]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[ethical]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Ethical Standards]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[fairness]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Fort Collins Coloradoan]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[fraternal associations]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[government restriction]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[lobbying organizations]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Loveland]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[policy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[political parties]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[politicians]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[professional organizations]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[public payroll system]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[unions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ethicalstandardsnow.org/?p=310</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A letter writer in today&#8217;s Fort Collins Coloradoan speaks out for Amendment 49, the Ethical Standards initiative:

I feel the editors of the Coloradoan have shortchanged their readers with their attempt to dismiss any serious constitutional proposal with the &#8220;just-say-no-to-everything&#8221; approach. They dismissed Amendment 49 as an anti-union attempt to manipulate the Constitution - which makes [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A letter writer in today&#8217;s <em>Fort Collins Coloradoan</em> <a href="http://www.coloradoan.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20081028/OPINION03/810280319">speaks out for Amendment 49</a>, the Ethical Standards initiative:<br />
<blockquote>
<p>I feel the editors of the Coloradoan have shortchanged their readers with their attempt to dismiss any serious constitutional proposal with the &#8220;just-say-no-to-everything&#8221; approach. They dismissed Amendment 49 as an anti-union attempt to manipulate the Constitution - which makes me wonder if they actually ever read the ballot language.</p>
<p>Amendment 49 restricts government but does not stop employees from organizing unions. The measure simply prevents government from using our public payroll system as a bank, collection agency and accountant for politically active lobbying organizations. These groups turn around and fund politicians&#8217; campaigns.</p>
<p>Does this include unions? Of course. But the amendment also prohibits taxpayer-funded collections for professional organizations, fraternal associations and political parties, which makes it fair across the board. Employees will have the same rights to go to any of these groups and join and support them as much as they want. Amendment 49 just says it&#8217;s more ethical to get government out of the collection and bundling business for lobbyists, where it doesn&#8217;t need to be in the first place.</p>
<p>Most of Colorado&#8217;s 3,000 governments have no policy to stop the whole scheme. Because the politicians are all subject to the possible conflict of interest, it&#8217;s up to the people to amend the Constitution and fix the mess.</p>
<p>Vote yes on Amendment 49.</p>
<p>BJ Nikkel,<br />
Loveland</p></blockquote>
<p></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ethicalstandardsnow.org/2008/10/coloradoan-letter-writer-amendment-49-about-basic-fairness-and-ethics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Former State Treasurer Mark Hillman Explains Amendment 49&#8217;s Basic Fairness</title>
		<link>http://www.ethicalstandardsnow.org/2008/10/former-state-treasurer-mark-hillman-explains-amendment-49s-basic-fairness/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ethicalstandardsnow.org/2008/10/former-state-treasurer-mark-hillman-explains-amendment-49s-basic-fairness/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 13:17:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Yes on Amendment 49</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Amendment 49]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[basic fairness]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[contributions]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[dues]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[endorsements]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Ethical Standards]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[lobbyists]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[local governments]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[major newspapers]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Mark Hillman]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[National Rifle Association]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[organizations]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[paycheck]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Sierra Club]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[special interests]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[state government]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[state treasurer]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[unions]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[voluntary contributions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ethicalstandardsnow.org/?p=307</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Former state treasurer Mark Hillman explains the simple logic that underlies the Ethical Standards initiative:

Amendment 49 (”ethical standards”) prohibits state and local governments from intercepting a worker’s paycheck to collect dues or contributions for unions, lobbyists or any other special interest.  It simply requires all interest groups to ask supporters directly for their contribution, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Former state treasurer Mark Hillman explains the simple logic <a href="http://www.markhillman.com/2008/10/24/voters-shouldnt-reward-labors-lies/">that underlies the Ethical Standards initiative</a>:<br />
<blockquote>
<p>Amendment 49 (”ethical standards”) prohibits state and local governments from intercepting a worker’s paycheck to collect dues or contributions for unions, lobbyists or any other special interest.  It simply requires all interest groups to ask supporters directly for their contribution, rather than use government payroll systems as their collection agency.</p>
<p>Groups from the National Rifle Association to the Sierra Club rely on voluntary contributions, so why can’t labor unions and other special interests?</p></blockquote>
<p></p>
<p>Amendment 49 is not only about ethics but also about basic fairness. That&#8217;s why so many major newspapers and organizations across Colorado <a href="http://www.ethicalstandardsnow.org/amendment-49-endorsements/">have endorsed the measure</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ethicalstandardsnow.org/2008/10/former-state-treasurer-mark-hillman-explains-amendment-49s-basic-fairness/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Delta County Letter Writer Cites Local Precedent for Amendment 49</title>
		<link>http://www.ethicalstandardsnow.org/2008/10/delta-county-letter-writer-cites-local-precedent-for-amendment-49/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ethicalstandardsnow.org/2008/10/delta-county-letter-writer-cites-local-precedent-for-amendment-49/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 17:36:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Yes on Amendment 49</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Letters to the Editor]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Amendment 49]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Arapahoe County]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Delta County]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Delta County Independent]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Douglas County]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[El Paso County]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Elbert County]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Ethical Standards]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[government payroll systems]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Jefferson County]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Kit Carson County]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Larimer County]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[local governments]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Mesa County]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Montrose County]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[politicians]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[private lobbying groups]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[special interests]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Teller County]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Weld County]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ethicalstandardsnow.org/?p=299</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From today&#8217;s Delta County Independent:

Dear Editor:
A lot of us may be looking around and scratching our heads when our ballots arrived. There’s all these ballot amendments and referenda to decide. Some have received more attention than others. One you may not have heard of, but need to know about, is Amendment 49.
Amendment 49 is called [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.deltacountyindependent.com/index.php?option=com_content&#038;view=article&#038;id=5293:give-amendment-49-a-hearty-yes&#038;catid=47:letters&#038;Itemid=78">From today&#8217;s <em>Delta County Independent</em></a>:<br />
<blockquote>
<p>Dear Editor:</p>
<p>A lot of us may be looking around and scratching our heads when our ballots arrived. There’s all these ballot amendments and referenda to decide. Some have received more attention than others. One you may not have heard of, but need to know about, is Amendment 49.</p>
<p>Amendment 49 is called the ethical standards initiative because it stops government payroll systems from collecting money and delivering it to private lobbying groups that try to influence our politicians.</p>
<p>Millions of dollars were funneled through this process last year in governments throughout Colorado. <strong>There are several local governments in Colorado that have tested the idea and found that it works. Delta County and Montrose County both adopted ethical standards earlier this year. We have helped to set the stage for the whole state to get behind this commonsense policy and make sure our elected officials are focused on vital services to taxpayers, not on collections and bookkeeping for special interests and lobbyists.</strong> [emphasis added]</p>
<p>I urge you to vote a hearty yes on Amendment 49.</p>
<p>Linda Sorenson<br />
Delta</p></blockquote>
<p></p>
<p>The other counties that have adopted Ethical Standards are: El Paso, Arapahoe, Jefferson, Douglas, Weld, Larimer, Mesa, Teller, Elbert, and Kit Carson.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ethicalstandardsnow.org/2008/10/delta-county-letter-writer-cites-local-precedent-for-amendment-49/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Campaign Finance Complaint Filed Against Amendment 49 Opponents</title>
		<link>http://www.ethicalstandardsnow.org/2008/10/campaign-finance-complaint-filed-against-amendment-49-opponents/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ethicalstandardsnow.org/2008/10/campaign-finance-complaint-filed-against-amendment-49-opponents/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 15:53:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Yes on Amendment 49</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Press Releases]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[accountant]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Amendment 49]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[banker]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Bill Owens]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Boulder Daily Camera]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[business groups]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[campaign finance law]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[civic groups]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[collection agent]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Colorado Springs]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Colorado Springs Education Association]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Colorado Springs Gazette]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Complaint]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Denver Post]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[endorsements]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[ethical government]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Ethical Standards]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[funnel]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[good-government]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Grand Junction Sentinel]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Hank Brown]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[illegall]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[in-kind contributions]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[issue committees]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Jon Caldara]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[lobbyists]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Longmont Times-Call]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Loveland Reporter-Herald]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[opponents]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[paychecks]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[politicians]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Protect Colorado's Future]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Pueblo Chieftain]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Reginald Perry]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Rocky Mountain News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[school board candidate]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[School District 11]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[special interest groups]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Teachers for Excellence in Education]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[teaches union]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[transfer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ethicalstandardsnow.org/?p=295</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[October 22, 2008
Complaint: Amendment 49 Opponents Break Law
Issue Committees Illegally Transferred Campaign Resources
ENGLEWOOD, CO – Supporters of a good-government initiative on this November&#8217;s ballot say a citizen&#8217;s complaint against amendment opponents highlights the need for reform.
Today, Colorado Springs resident and former school board candidate Reginald Perry filed a formal complaint against the issue committee Protect [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>October 22, 2008</p>
<p align="center"><strong>Complaint: Amendment 49 Opponents Break Law<br />
Issue Committees Illegally Transferred Campaign Resources</strong></p>
<p>ENGLEWOOD, CO – Supporters of a good-government initiative on this November&#8217;s ballot say a citizen&#8217;s complaint against amendment opponents highlights the need for reform.</p>
<p>Today, Colorado Springs resident and former school board candidate Reginald Perry filed a formal complaint against the issue committee Protect Colorado&#8217;s Future (PCF) and a teachers union-run issue committee for a clear violation of existing campaign finance law. PCF has raised and spent nearly $8 million to fight Amendment 49 and two other statewide ballot measures.</p>
<p>Existing rules state that &#8220;An issue committee shall not contribute to, or accept contributions from, other issue committees that do not support or oppose issues supported or opposed by the issue committee making the contribution.&#8221; The Colorado Springs Education Association (CSEA) committee Teachers for Excellence in Education made nearly $2,800 in in-kind contributions to PCF, which was created to address statewide ballot issues. CSEA&#8217;s committee is designed to &#8220;promote ballot issues in School District 11.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;I find it disturbing to see the teachers union funnel resources earmarked for local education issues into a fight against statewide political issues they don&#8217;t happen to like,&#8221; Perry said.</p>
<p>Amendment 49 proponents say the fault also lies with the committee accepting the contribution.</p>
<p>&#8220;It only helps to make our case when our opponents break the law just to raise a little more money to fight ethical government,&#8221; said Jon Caldara.<br />
<span id="more-295"></span><br />
Also known as the Ethical Standards initiative, Amendment 49 will prohibit governments from bundling money from public employees&#8217; paychecks and delivering the funds to special interest groups.  These special interests use the money to lobby the same politicians who just delivered the cash to them. </p>
<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s unethical for government to be the banker, accountant, and collection agent for political special interests,&#8221; Caldara said. &#8220;Government should be using our tax dollars and our civil servants&#8217; time to provide crucial public services, not to funnel money to political organizations.&#8221;</p>
<p>Major Colorado newspapers supporting Amendment 49 include the <em>Denver Post</em>, <em>Rocky Mountain News</em>, <em>Boulder Daily Camera</em>, <em>Pueblo Chieftain</em>, <em>Grand Junction Daily Sentinel</em>, <em>Colorado Springs Gazette</em>, <em>Longmont Times-Call</em>, and <em>Loveland Reporter-Herald</em>. In addition to the editorial endorsements, numerous business and civic groups, along with former U.S. Senator Hank Brown and former Gov. Bill Owens, have lined up behind the amendment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ethicalstandardsnow.org/2008/10/campaign-finance-complaint-filed-against-amendment-49-opponents/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
